Engagement in Praxis in Critical Applied Linguistics

This members-only webinar will take place on Tuesday, June 23, 2020, from 1:00 to 2:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time.

This webinar will be recorded and posted to the website for members of AAAL.

Engagement in Praxis in Critical Applied Linguistics

Abstract              

This talk will advocate increased engagement in praxis—critical reflection and action—in critical applied linguistics. Critical approaches to applied linguistics have exposed and problematized hegemony and unequal relations of power in various language-related issues. As such, the critical lens applies to all inquiry areas within applied linguistic, which by AAAL definition develops “its own knowledge-base about language, its users and uses, and their underlying social and material conditions.” As this definition indicates, applied linguistics, as in other disciplines, is primarily concerned with knowledge generation and circulation. Critical applied linguistics has also contributed to the development of the knowledge-base by questioning taken-for-granted assumptions. Indeed, multiple concepts and theoretical frameworks for critical inquiry—from linguistic imperialism, poststructuralism, and critical pedagogies to issues of race, neoliberalism, and colonialism—have expanded our critical understanding.

Yet, language-related problems persist in real-world settings. They include the privileging of elite bilingualism at the cost of indigenous or minoritized students’ plurilingual development, racist policies and practices in hiring teachers, test-driven language education profiting testing and related industries, and many more. Our efforts to critically address language-related issues do not seem to significantly improve real-world conditions.

Recently, critical scholars have paid increased attention to the political economy in language studies. While this interest in materiality extends the existing popularity of poststructuralist analysis of discourse and identity, examining the political economy is also likely to result in the mere development of our knowledge-base. Furthermore, critical applied linguists’ continued engagement in this intellectual exercise can easily be absorbed in the neoliberal institutional regime that primarily rewards quantitatively measured scholarly productivity. It is imperative for us to continue affirming various kinds of difference and critiquing material conditions, but we also must enact our criticality for establishing anti-racist, anti-oppressive, and anti-neoliberal policies and practices through public scholarship and scholarly activism.