|
|||||
|
Variationist Approaches in SLA Beginning in the 1970s, students of SLA were attracted to the model of sociolinguistic research known as “variationist.” In those days, the notion of the “variable rule” was one closely tied to generativist formalizations and shared with them the hope that they modeled cognitive reality. Such a hope made that variety of sociolinguistics appealing to SLA researchers, whose focus has always been more psycho- than socio-linguistically oriented. Over the years, the psycholinguistic import of variable rules faded, and the statistical program “VARBRUL” came to be widely utilized as a device to determine the influences of various factors (linguistic and nonlinguistic) in the selection of an available linguistic form. This mode of research continued to attract SLA researchers, since many believed that a multiplicity of factors influenced the choice a learner might make from the repertoire of his or her developing interlanguage and that the probabilities associated with these various influences could characterize the development itself. SLA researchers whose main interest was not sociolinguistic even suggested that variation was the key to learning. During this same period, the creole continuum and implicational scales were also invoked as explanatory devices in SLA, but that possibility is not explored in this presentation. Most recently variationists have tried to revive cognitive models of variation in developing interlanguages and have suggested once again that the influences on selection from a repertoire of items is a profitable way to characterize learners of various sorts and at various stages.
Bio-statement
|
|||||
|
Please direct questions to aaal2007@indiana.edu * Costa Mesa, California * April 21-24, 2007 |